Are we being taught “fake” stuff in history? Explain.
I don’t think we are being taught “fake” stuff. I think we are being taught biased stuff. Every article in history has a little biasness in it based on which side wrote it. You can never fully describe a conflict truthfully with absolutely NO biasness. No matter if the writer is in the conflict or not they are going to have a personal view on who started the conflict and how people won and stuff. No matter where you learn it or when, there is going to be a side favored because everybody has their own opinion which gets put into their story whether they want it to or not.
Who knows, maybe you’ll see me again making history in somebody’s opinion. Then again, I might not in another person’s eyes. We’ll just have to wait and see=)
